PSY2070 CALU understanding Emotion a Continuing Dialogue
Order your essay today — written by real experts, guaranteed plagiarism-free, and ready to impress your professor!
Q: Understanding Emotion – a continuing dialogue
Listen to Invisobilia (NPR) Podcast from June 1, 2017 titled “Emotions: Part 1”: http://www.npr.org/2017/06/01/530928414/emotions-p…
Need Help Writing an Essay?
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Write My Essay For Me~ it is sometimes easier to listen while driving, doing chores like folding laundry or doing dishes!
- What struck you about the contents of this podcast?
- Some of the ideas about emotions and the way trauma impacts the brain might be controversial. How did you react to these ideas?
- How would you challenge them or how might you be intrigued to explore more?
1) What struck you about the contents of this podcast?
The podcast talks about emotions and how they could affect people and change their lives. Two adults (Tom and Amanda) had an accident. Amanda daughter died in the accident but Tom was emotionally traumatized because of that. I really shocked when I know that Tom opens a court for emotional injury and win it. Emotions can be different from one person to another. Emotions affect us and some times control you whether you control them. It is a terrible feeling when the emotion controls you, keep you away from what you like, what you do, or life.
Some of the ideas about emotions and the way trauma impacts the brain might be controversial. How did you react to these ideas?
The human brain is one of the most complex systems on earth. No one knows the real reason for people to feel emotional or complete their life. With all of the discoveries and the science of the brain, the human being still does not understand how the brain works. Scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. It could be right and it could be wrong.
How would you challenge them or how might you be intrigued to explore more?
Theories are constantly being refigured. Many theories turned out to be resting on some questionable data. That has not stopped discoveries from being hailed as important, game-changing accomplishments a bit prematurely.
2)What Struck You About the Contents of This Podcast?
The podcast explores important issues regarding emotions and their perception in society. What struck me most about the content presented is the possibility that culture might be wrong regarding the popular view: emotions are instilled in individuals at birth. As the panel comprising Rosaldo, Spiegel, and Rosin discusses the issue, it becomes apparent that emotions are primarily a reaction, much like reflexes (“Emotions,” 2017). Consequently, one can argue that the environment and experiences, as opposed to biology, determine people’s emotions.
Some of the Ideas About Emotions and the Way Trauma Impacts the Brain Might Be Controversial. How Did You React to These Ideas?
The ideas regarding emotions and their impact on the brain are controversial. I was surprised by the example that the panelists explore regarding emotional reactions. In particular, the truck driver who was involved in an accident that resulted in the death of a young girl sued her parents for emotional trauma, and the court ruled in his favour. My first thought was that the driver was the opportunist who wanted to exploit the girl’s parents. However, upon closer examination, I realized that emotions are complex and are based on many factors, including a person’s upbringing and how he or she is taught to react to them. Considering the driver’s experiences while growing up, I understood that he had been genuinely traumatized by the incident.
How Would You Challenge Them or How Might You Be Intrigued to Explore More?
While the presented ideas seem to contradict my current views, I am intrigued to explore them more. The emotions are complex, and for an individual to truly understand the principles inherent in them, he or she has to be willing to consider new perspectives.
References
Emotions. (2017). NPR. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2017/06/01/530928414/emotions-…
3) Understanding Emotions
The podcast illustrates the description of emotions and how the human brain responds to reactions. The podcast starts with a discussion of the effects of emotion in human life and how it affects the future of a person. For instance, Tommy grew up knowing that a man should not be controlled by emotions, and his father used to force him to be strong and tough. On the other hand, Amanda grew up knowing that it was okay to be emotional and reactive towards what life offered. Both Amanda and Tommy grew up having different perspectives towards emotions and how to control them (National Public Radio, 2017). The issue was how their later life affected both individuals due to the different definitions of emotions. After the accident, Amanda was the victim due to the loss of her baby, but one year later, Tommy sued Amanda and her husband for the trauma they caused. The incident was absurd. At first, I thought they were joking about Tommy suing Amanda imagining how the family who had lost their baby would feel. And the ridiculous thing is that Tommy won the case. Understanding emotions are hard, but I came to realize how theoretical approaches and scientific perspectives work to explain emotions and the causes of trauma.
Additionally, I listened to the podcast more than one time intending to understand how emotions are explained. Barrett helped in explaining her psychological perspective towards emotions and trauma. Trauma is caused by emotions. Emotions are the reflexes that strike in the human brain, which might be caused by different situations. For example, Amanda was emotional after she learned that her daughter had died in the accident. She was supposed to react that way based on her loss. But, the victim of trauma after the accident was Tommy, who claimed to have succumbed to PTSD. Tommy’s arguments were based on the images that kept flashing in his mind of the young girl’s hand swinging outside the window of the car during the accident. He knew he had killed a person who affected his judgments for more than a year (National Public Radio, 2017). However, the involvement of childhood memories and teachings about emotions would have a minimal effect on how people handle trauma and stress. For instance, the arguments supporting Tommy’s traumatized situation while Amanda is unbothered is irrelevant, whereby some people would not support the arguments. Also, it would be difficult to rely on past experiences to define current emotional situations. I could not agree with the arguments supporting how Tommy was the victim in the situation, and he could not control his emotions for almost a year.
Moreover, the strategy of understanding the involvement of emotions in trauma is not described effectively based on the arguments presented in the case of Amanda and Tommy. For example, Amanda was the victim in the case as she lost her child during the accident, but the beneficiary was Tommy who argued that he lost emotional control, which has never happened in his life, and he needed compensation. His arguments towards the case were relevant based on his loss of wages, but Tommy could not have thought of the situation were it not his lawyer’s ideas (National Public Radio, 2017). Also, I would challenge the case due to the duty of a person to be responsible for their happiness. Emotions are generated internally and triggered by situations, but someone could not blame another person due to their sorrows or trauma. For example, Tommy blamed Amanda’s husband for reckless driving, which caused the accident and affected Tommy for almost a year. Therefore, I would have revisited the case, and Tommy would not have won the litigation because all he needed was therapy during the first month after the accident.
Burnett International College Essay Help
