Order your essay today — written by real experts, guaranteed plagiarism-free, and ready to impress your professor!
Primary Differences Between the Structures of the Literature Reviews
Qualitative research has been understood as being important for exploratory purposes. Using it helps one to understand the reasons, motivations as well as opinions behind a certain subject. As a research tool, it gives insights into a given problem and hence serve as a hypothesis for future quantitative analysis (Yilmaz, 2013). Quantitative research on the other hand quantifies issues at hand through numerical data which must be interpreted using mathematical means to draw conclusions. Therefore, whereas qualitative deals with attitudes, feelings, opinions and thoughts of people, quantitative is about hard facts. In terms of sampling, whereas in qualitative research sampling is purposive, in quantitative it is rather random.
The methods used in collecting data in qualitative is either semi structured or unstructured while in quantitative, data is collected through surveys as well as systematic observations. The main objective of carrying out a qualitative research is to explore and discover ideas that are used in the ongoing processes while quantitative is mainly meant to examine cause and effect relationship between given variables.
Danielle Mulligan’s and Watkins dissertation can be said to be quantitative and qualitative respectively owing to the former being more subjective and relying on opinions of other scholars as opposed to the latter which is more objective with interpretative approaches based on a problem at hand
Rationale for the Observed Differences
The differences between the two types of research is based on the following factors: The meanings and applications, what the two deals with, what the two types of research is meant to achieve/objective, the methodology of sampling that is employed for the two and whether the research to be undertaken is exploratory or it is meant to draw conclusions.
Daniel Mulligan’s dissertation was mainly centered at cross-examining how servant leadership impacts the climate of the classroom and the general achievement of the students. Such kind of research has to be conclusive and based on facts as they are after conducting a thorough data collection procedure related to the topic. It has a cause and effect analysis which forms the main difference with qualitative (Brannen, 2017). A review of literature around this topic therefore had to entail considering what previous scholars had done on evidence based practice. The research has to bring out a clear correlation between the teacher’s servant leadership traits and their influence on the student’s outcome. The study is also quantitative since it will have to consider many variables including time. For there to be a conclusive statement, necessary data entailed many instruments that can be of importance in quantifying leadership behavior, the climate of the classroom as well as performance of the student.
Watkins dissertation is a qualitative research owing to its exploratory nature and the questions that linger around the topic of discussion. The research is not based on a conclusive end but rather on opinions from scholars and what the theoretical grounding of the topic. The methodology employed by Watkins clearly proves that the study is qualitative and not quantitative. The study entails looking at the opinions and experiences of coaches to draw conclusions as pertains the coach education. It also entailed purposive sampling which had specific participants in mind. This is unlike in quantitative sampling where it is done at random.
References
Brannen, J. (2017). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Routledge.
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311-325.
The Watkins (qualitative) dissertation. Literature Review P30-84
The Mulligan (quantitative) dissertation. Literature Review P26-84
